As if the pretense death provided us it release of this necessity almost logical to make a mistake for, at last, still only in assuming to them 4. Everything seems us duly clearly. of glow notable who is, we feel ourselves legitimated to the formularization of a notion of I that, for effect, is deplored. If we are not enough exactly for us, I interrogate to them: Of where the guilt? Nobody erra without reasons, I think 5. no error I think to be possible free of some (lowermost that it is) relation 6. Assevero to them: I believe that all error that if it judges possible is not more than the desperation of the morality human being agonizing for on the yearning of already more not having of if blaming. That the sin is a vacant delirium and alone of the mind. no possible universe will perceive in the manifestation of the spirit of the men the hypothetical and pretense moral value of its action.

This says respect only to the scope where the reason creates its laws and, maken a mistake using itself of the not atypical subterfuge already: the senile esquecimento with that if it tries one to justify itself, is felt legitimated to extend to the units others of your proper species that one already alluded eticidade delirium yours. Yesterday I committed an error 7 which never I will olvidarei. More still: The cruelty is amazing with that today I take the blame 8 for the materialization of improper 9; Desumana is still the now present anguish for the fact of still yesterday. Worse of everything? Exactly thinking the guilt to be a moral point of view 10 on the fact that (I believe) always it estimates, as any manifestation of our spirit, a relation and for this exactly also the double-citizen, still I think to be the culprit. I want this guilt as only mine 11. That the morality of the action is only one judgment. But what I am seno the will of this exactly stops beyond which, when self-sacrificing, already more I do not perceive the supposed presence of I in place some? In synthesis: We do not have 12 to always leave of the estimated one of that it has perfect coincidence between a deontological the filling of a suit 13 and the supposed nature of an action that if assumes. Not even to think that the action there is justified by the context, attributing to it thus the positive moral value with that if it intends to excuse itself.

Perhaps in fact never it had guilt; inasmuch as also it did not have there more than what a curious subject presumption of itself exactly. However, that act I will leave tacit the nature of this me was object; as any object, also nothing pronounces it me, opening me the opportune one of the interpretation. The guilt is effect of the judgment for manifest me to the pretense action where the anguish for the error almost becomes me evident me. is always better and in agreement the peace that if it claims to feel itself guilty of a hypothetical error, that proper the hypothetical one to the doubtless error that makes in them to feel us guilty.

Soon. I understood in that instant that would not be a task, but at last, I thought: If I want to know I eat am the seen world of chair of wheels, am necessary, over all to reflect concerning the being that if special tax on one, giving life to it. What he implies this relation? To insert me in this context, therefore I cannot take off it of the chair, duly warned to see to the world, only? seated? Comfortably only Strangely alone The first problem was presented me then: to find a place to seat me, without bothering it It was when, I heard: Father! He brings our chair! Surprise. My son already had reserved a place. She was to the side of it! The great day arrived. To the entrance I received a news where were written some? rules? of convivncia: It never looks at for me and if it sees, this will become our impossible convivncia; It does not yield to the impulse to idealize a world for me, the world already exists; It does not wait a special place, I do not believe specialties? ; The eyes will be our lighthouses, keep them open so that let us guide in them for them; Smiles alone the necessary one; to the times the easy smiles hide the edificadoras tears; It does not have fear, seated, we see the people very great, but illusion is alone; One gets used with the incontinence.

E remembers to contain itself; One remembers: I allow one season it, I do not open hand of my privacy; He is obligator to gain the weight of its? luggage, therefore we do not support excess. It only brings the necessary one; If to nauseate in the start of the trip, if does not worry. It is why instead of walking, I fly To each comment, a reflection. I perceived that it was not the chair that was present; yes, I was absent. That the parents when they move away themselves from its children; something occupies that space.

My apia son in a chair, others in the drugs. If its son walks. He has one? he marches perfect? , excellent. However he does not forget? the most perfect march is of the ideas. It thinks in this! How much to the world; I learned that a world does not exist, and yes? the world. that it is not seen; it is lived. the different look? It is in the eyes of the mind Shopenhauer? Ah! I sign in low. The will is the essence of the world. how much to the chairs! Let us learn with them. They speak! our children, also.